waggle-os/docs/production-readiness/05-TEST_REPORT.md

05 - TEST & COVERAGE REPORT

Date: 2026-03-20 Auditor: Claude Opus 4.6 (automated, read-only) Scope: All packages, integration tests, E2E tests, visual regression tests

---

1. Test Distribution

Summary Totals

Metric	Count
Total test files	278
Total test cases (it/test)	~3,762 (packages + root tests)
App test cases	188
Grand total test cases	~3,950

Per-Package Breakdown

Package	Source Files	Test Files	Test Cases	Ratio (tests/src)
@waggle/agent	95	95	1,272	1.00
@waggle/server	92	86	904	0.93
@waggle/ui	102	27	809	0.26
@waggle/core	27	24	330	0.89
@waggle/marketplace	12	6	160	0.50
@waggle/sdk	8	5	66	0.63
@waggle/cli	7	7	52	1.00
@waggle/worker	9	4	38	0.44
@waggle/weaver	3	3	30	1.00
@waggle/waggle-dance	4	3	25	0.75
@waggle/optimizer	3	1	17	0.33
@waggle/launcher	1	1	13	1.00
@waggle/shared	4	1	9	0.25
@waggle/admin-web	10	1	5	0.10
app (Tauri desktop)	66	9	188	0.14
sidecar	6	3	~20	0.50
tests/ (root integration)	-	5	32	-

Observations

• agent and server have excellent file-level coverage (1:1 or near it).
• ui has low file-level ratio (0.26) -- 102 source files but only 27 test files. Tests exist for utility functions, hooks, and exports but most React component rendering is deferred to "the desktop app's E2E suite."
• admin-web has minimal coverage (1 test file / 10 source files, 5 assertions total).
• app (Tauri desktop) has 66 source files but only 9 test files. The E2E tests cover startup, chat, workspaces, and regression scenarios via Fastify inject() (not browser automation).
• shared has only 1 test file for 4 source files.

---

2. Test Quality Assessment

File 1: packages/core/tests/vault.test.ts (11 tests)

Criterion	Rating	Notes
Behavior vs implementation	Behavior	Tests CRUD operations, encryption verification, migration -- all user-facing behaviors
Mock quality	Excellent	No mocks needed -- uses real VaultStore with temp directories
Edge cases	Good	Covers nonexistent keys, idempotent migration, key file reuse, plaintext leak check
Assertions	Meaningful	Verifies actual decrypted values, file-on-disk encryption format, metadata propagation
Test isolation	Excellent	Each test creates its own temp dir; afterEach cleans up
Missing	Wrong password/corrupted vault file scenarios not tested (see Section 3)

File 2: packages/agent/tests/agent-loop.test.ts (8 tests)

Criterion	Rating	Notes
Behavior vs implementation	Behavior	Tests the full agent loop: text response, tool execution, maxTurns, plugin tools, capability routing
Mock quality	Good	mockFetch returns realistic OpenAI-format responses with proper structure
Edge cases	Good	Tests maxTurns safety, missing tool routing, plugin+base tool merging
Assertions	Meaningful	Verifies content, tool usage, token counting, fetch call structure, message threading
Test isolation	Good	Each test creates fresh mocks
Missing	No tests for: fetch failures/timeouts, rate limiting, malformed LLM responses, concurrent requests

File 3: packages/server/tests/ws/gateway.test.ts (10 tests)

Criterion	Rating	Notes
Behavior vs implementation	Behavior	Tests connection tracking, broadcast, exclusion, send-to-user, closed socket handling
Mock quality	Adequate	Uses { readyState, OPEN, send: vi.fn() } -- minimal but sufficient for unit tests
Edge cases	Good	Nonexistent teams, nonexistent users, closed sockets, last-user-leaves cleanup
Assertions	Meaningful	Checks exact call counts, JSON payload structure, team count
Test isolation	Excellent	Fresh ConnectionManager per test
Missing	No reconnection logic tests, no concurrent broadcast tests, no WebSocket error event handling

File 4: packages/agent/tests/connector-sdk.test.ts (~25 tests)

Criterion	Rating	Notes
Behavior vs implementation	Behavior	Tests interface compliance, definition mapping, tool generation, registry CRUD, audit logging, error handling
Mock quality	Good	MockConnector extends BaseConnector with realistic actions and risk levels; MockVault has proper credential resolution
Edge cases	Good	API timeout errors, duplicate registration, disconnected connectors, missing credentials, expired tokens
Assertions	Meaningful	Checks tool name formats, risk level propagation, audit log payloads, error messages
Test isolation	Good	Fresh registry per test
Missing	No concurrent connector execution, no partial failure in multi-connector scenarios

File 5: packages/ui/tests/components/chat.test.ts (~35 tests)

Criterion	Rating	Notes
Behavior vs implementation	Mixed	Tests utility functions (getToolStatusColor, formatDuration, processStreamEvent) and verifies exports exist -- but no actual React component rendering
Mock quality	N/A	No mocks needed for utility function tests
Edge cases	Good	Covers all tool statuses (done, pending, denied, error, running), legacy fallback without status field
Assertions	Meaningful	Return value checks for utility functions
Test isolation	Good	Pure functions, stateless
Missing	No rendering tests -- relies entirely on desktop E2E. No tests for user interaction flows, form submission, error display, loading states

---

3. Untested Critical Paths

CRITICAL Severity

Gap	Description	Risk
SSE stream interruption handling	Zero tests for SSE connection drops, reconnection, or partial event parsing. useNotifications hook has reconnection logic in source but no test covers the error/reconnect path.	Users may lose agent output mid-response with no recovery
Vault corruption/wrong key	Vault tests verify happy path only. No test for: corrupted vault.json, missing/wrong .vault-key file, concurrent write conflicts.	Silent data loss or unrecoverable state
Sub-agent cleanup on failure	subagent-tools.test.ts tests a single error case (LLM connection failed returns error string) but does not verify resource cleanup (open connections, temp files, memory entries) after sub-agent crash.	Resource leaks under failure
WebSocket reconnection logic	Source code in useNotifications.ts and useSubAgentStatus.ts has reconnection logic, but no test verifies reconnection actually re-establishes state.	Silent presence/notification failures after network blips

HIGH Severity

Gap	Description	Risk
Server route: fleet	packages/server/src/local/routes/fleet.ts -- Mission Control fleet API has zero test coverage	Broken fleet status could go undetected
Server route: import	packages/server/src/local/routes/import.ts -- memory import (ChatGPT/Claude parsers) route has zero direct test coverage. Core processImport is tested in core/tests/memory-import.test.ts but the HTTP route layer is not.	Import failures at route level undetected
Server route: anthropic-proxy	Built-in Anthropic proxy (/v1/chat/completions) has no dedicated test file. Only tangentially referenced in health.test.ts.	Proxy translation bugs (OpenAI -> Anthropic format) undetected
Worker handlers: group-handler.ts, task-handler.ts	No test files for these handlers. Only chat-handler.ts and waggle-dispatch.ts are tested.	Background task execution failures undetected
Marketplace: installer.ts, security.ts	No dedicated test files. security.ts (SecurityGate) is partially covered via cisco-scanner.test.ts but the installer module has no direct tests.	Broken install flow or security bypass undetected
Admin-web	10 source files, 1 test file, 5 assertions total. All 7 page components effectively untested.	Admin dashboard regressions undetected

MEDIUM Severity

Gap	Description	Risk
Agent loop: LLM error responses	No test for HTTP 429 (rate limit), 500 (server error), malformed JSON, or network timeout from the LLM provider	Agent may hang or crash on provider issues
Memory corruption recovery	backup-restore.test.ts exists but no test verifies recovery from a corrupted .mind SQLite file (e.g., truncated WAL, invalid schema version)	Unrecoverable personal data loss
Concurrent vault access	No test for two processes reading/writing vault.json simultaneously	Race condition could corrupt secrets
Sidecar: agent-session.ts, weaver-scheduler.ts	No tests for these 2 of 6 sidecar source files	Desktop agent session bugs undetected
UI component rendering	102 UI source files but zero React rendering tests. All chat, memory, cockpit, settings components tested only via export-existence checks and utility functions.	Visual/interaction regressions undetected without manual testing
Notification routes	packages/server/src/local/routes/notifications.ts has no dedicated route test. local/notifications.test.ts tests the notification system but not the SSE streaming endpoint.	Notification delivery failures undetected
Optimizer signatures.ts	No test coverage for prompt optimization signatures module	Broken GEPA optimization undetected

---

4. E2E Tests

Vitest-Based E2E (app/tests/e2e/)

File	Scenarios Covered
startup.test.ts	Health check, onboarding wizard, settings persistence across restart
chat.test.ts	Chat message -> SSE token stream, tool events in stream, approval gate (eventBus blocks/resumes)
workspaces.test.ts	Workspace CRUD, workspace switching, session isolation
regression.test.ts	Regression scenarios (specifics not inspected)

All use Fastify inject() -- no real browser automation. These are server-level integration tests, not true E2E tests.

Agent-Level E2E (packages/agent/tests/e2e/)

File	Scenarios Covered
solo-scenarios.test.ts	S1: Research report (web_search -> save -> docx), S2: Code review, S3: Project planning, S4: Memory continuity
connector-swarm-scenarios.test.ts	C1: GitHub issue creation, C2: Email with approval gate, Swarm parallel/sequential/coordinator execution

These use mock tool execution (no real LLM) -- they verify tool chain orchestration, not real LLM interaction.

Playwright Visual Regression (tests/visual/)

File	Coverage
views.spec.ts	Screenshot baselines for 7 views (Chat, Memory, Events, Capabilities, Cockpit, Mission Control, Settings) in dark + light mode = 14 baselines

Requires running server. Uses 0.3% pixel diff threshold. No user interaction tests -- screenshots only.

What is Missing from E2E

• No browser-automated user journey tests (typing in chat, clicking buttons, navigating between views)
• No onboarding flow E2E (full wizard completion in browser)
• No multi-workspace switching E2E in browser
• No connector setup/teardown flow E2E
• No marketplace browse/install flow E2E
• No approval gate click-through E2E in browser

---

5. Kill List Coverage Matrix

#	Kill List Item	Test Coverage	Assessment
1	Workspace restart / instant catch-up	core/tests/mind/awareness.test.ts, core/tests/mind/frames.test.ts, server/tests/routes/workspace-context.test.ts, server/tests/routes/context-injection.test.ts, server/tests/routes/session-state-extraction.test.ts	GOOD -- Context reconstruction, frame retrieval, and session state extraction all tested. Server-side catch-up endpoint tested. No E2E test of the full "open workspace -> see context" flow.
2	Draft from accumulated context	agent/tests/document-tools.test.ts (docx generation), agent/tests/e2e/solo-scenarios.test.ts (research -> docx chain), agent/tests/workflow-composer.test.ts	ADEQUATE -- Document generation tested with markdown parsing, tables, lists, subdirectories. Workflow chains tested. No test verifying draft quality uses accumulated workspace memory.
3	Decision compression / next-step thinking	weaver/tests/consolidation.test.ts, weaver/tests/consolidation-enhanced.test.ts, agent/tests/orchestrator.test.ts	PARTIAL -- Memory consolidation (the mechanism behind decision compression) is tested. No dedicated test verifying "what was decided about X?" returns compressed decisions.
4	Research and synthesis in context	agent/tests/e2e/solo-scenarios.test.ts (S1: research report), agent/tests/combined-retrieval.test.ts, agent/tests/search-memory-combined.test.ts, agent/tests/web-search-cache.test.ts	GOOD -- Combined retrieval (memory + KVARK), web search, and research-to-document chains all tested.
5	Ongoing project memory for solo operators	core/tests/mind/ (10 test files), core/tests/multi-mind.test.ts, agent/tests/search-memory-combined.test.ts, server/tests/workspace-api.test.ts	STRONG -- Most thoroughly tested area. Frame storage, FTS5 search, temporal knowledge, identity, awareness, knowledge graph -- all covered with 330+ test cases in core alone.
6	Capability discovery and installation	agent/tests/capability-acquisition.test.ts, agent/tests/capability-marketplace.test.ts, server/tests/routes/acquisition-integration.test.ts, server/tests/local/marketplace*.test.ts (5 files), ui/tests/components/install-center.test.ts, core/tests/mind/install-audit.test.ts	STRONG -- Discovery, acquisition, trust model, security scanning, approval gate, install center UI, audit trail -- all tested. 16+ test files cover this flow.
7	External action execution (connectors)	agent/tests/connector-sdk.test.ts, agent/tests/connector-routing.test.ts, agent/tests/connectors/ (8 files for GitHub, Slack, Jira, email, etc.), agent/tests/e2e/connector-swarm-scenarios.test.ts, server/tests/local/connectors.test.ts, server/tests/local/connector-registry-integration.test.ts	GOOD -- Connector SDK, registry, individual connector types, tool generation, audit logging, error handling all tested. No test for real API calls (all mocked). Missing: connector credential refresh, expired token re-auth.
8	Multi-agent workflows (swarm)	waggle-dance/tests/ (3 files: protocol, dispatcher, integration), agent/tests/subagent-tools.test.ts, agent/tests/subagent-orchestrator.test.ts, agent/tests/e2e/connector-swarm-scenarios.test.ts, worker/tests/execution/strategies.test.ts, server/tests/daemons/hive-mind.test.ts	ADEQUATE -- Protocol, dispatching, parallel/sequential/coordinator execution strategies, hive-mind daemon all tested. Missing: swarm failure recovery (partial agent failures), swarm cancellation, resource limits under concurrent swarm execution.

Kill List Summary

Rating	Items
STRONG (4+/5)	#5 (project memory), #6 (capability discovery)
GOOD (3/5)	#1 (catch-up), #4 (research), #7 (connectors)
ADEQUATE (2.5/5)	#2 (drafting), #3 (decision compression), #8 (swarm)
WEAK (<2/5)	None

---

6. Overall Test Health Assessment

Strengths

1. Exceptional volume: ~3,950 test cases across 278 files is substantial for a project of this size. The claimed 3,069 tests all passing is credible based on the file counts.

2. Core and agent packages are well-covered: The two most critical packages (core: memory/mind, agent: tools/loop) have near 1:1 file coverage and deep behavioral tests.

3. Kill List items all have coverage: Every V1 must-win use case has at least adequate test coverage. No kill list item is completely untested.

4. Good test isolation: Tests consistently use temp directories, fresh instances, and proper cleanup. No shared mutable state between tests.

5. Behavior-focused testing: The majority of tests verify user-facing behaviors rather than implementation details. Mocks are realistic (proper response structures, not trivial stubs).

6. Performance benchmarks exist: Cold start, FTS5 search, batch writes, and session load times are all benchmarked with threshold assertions.

7. Security paths are tested: Marketplace security scanning (Cisco scanner), vault encryption, injection scanner, trust model, approval gates, permission checks -- all covered.

Weaknesses

1. No real browser E2E tests: All "E2E" tests use Fastify inject() or mock tool execution. The Playwright tests are screenshot-only (visual regression) with no user interaction. There is zero coverage of actual user flows in a real browser.

2. UI component rendering untested: 102 UI source files have zero React rendering tests. The test file for chat.test.ts explicitly states "no jsdom/React Testing Library." This means any rendering regression (broken layout, missing props, conditional rendering bugs) goes undetected.

3. Error/failure paths underrepresented: Happy paths are well-tested, but failure scenarios are sparse. SSE interruption, LLM provider errors, vault corruption, concurrent access, WebSocket reconnection -- these critical failure modes have minimal or zero coverage.

4. Admin-web is effectively untested: 5 assertions for 10 source files. The admin dashboard could be completely broken and tests would still pass.

5. Several server routes have zero test files: fleet, import, anthropic-proxy, and notifications routes lack dedicated tests.

6. Worker handlers partially untested: group-handler.ts and task-handler.ts have no tests -- these handle background task execution.

Risk Rating

Category	Rating
Unit test coverage	B+ (strong in core/agent/server, weak in ui/admin-web/shared)
Integration test coverage	B (good server integration, missing cross-package integration)
E2E test coverage	D+ (exists but no real browser automation; inject-only)
Error path coverage	C- (happy paths strong, failure/edge paths sparse)
Kill List alignment	B+ (all items covered, some with depth gaps)
Overall	B-

Priority Recommendations

1. P0: Add browser-automated E2E tests for the daily-use loop (open workspace -> send message -> see response -> navigate views). Even 5 real Playwright interaction tests would dramatically improve confidence.

2. P0: Add failure-path tests for SSE stream interruption and LLM provider errors -- these affect every user session.

3. P1: Add vault corruption/recovery tests (corrupted JSON, missing key file, concurrent writes).

4. P1: Add dedicated tests for untested server routes (fleet, import, anthropic-proxy).

5. P1: Add at least basic React rendering tests for critical UI components (ChatArea, ApprovalGate, WorkspaceHome) using jsdom or React Testing Library.

6. P2: Add worker handler tests for group-handler.ts and task-handler.ts.

7. P2: Increase admin-web test coverage from 5 assertions to meaningful page-level tests.

8. P2: Add sub-agent resource cleanup verification tests.