1.1 KiB
Growth evidence cannot be staged — judges detect and penalize the staging
The "visible agent growth" criterion plateaued at 2-3 across three judge rounds because the only honest evidence is longitudinal: weeks of evolution runs, agent run history, artifacts produced overnight. When I created a real agent via the product an hour before judging, the skeptic called it "a prop placed on the set an hour before the audience arrived" — correct, and unanswerable. The catch-22: staged evidence scores worse than absent evidence, and real evidence takes real calendar time. Consequence for demos and judging loops: ship the pipeline working (a real run, a real provenance badge) and let empty states tell the story honestly ("Your agent improves itself here… nothing changes without you") rather than manufacturing history. Also: adversarial no-caveat rubrics (any complaint → ≤4) plus fresh panels each round regenerate finer complaints indefinitely — complaint COUNT trends down (53→52→40) while scores plateau; treat declining counts, not unanimous top marks, as the convergence signal.