moving

docs/launch/drafts/2026-05-10-pavlukhin-evolveschema-arxiv-email.md

@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+# DAY0-CRED-05 / CONT-03 — Pavlukhin EVOLVESCHEMA arxiv submission email (DRAFT)
+
+**Target:** Mikhail Pavlukhin
+**Author:** Marko Marković (Marko sends; I draft)
+**Purpose:** Path A endorsement chain — request standalone EVOLVESCHEMA arxiv preprint so Marko's LoCoMo paper can cite it + benefit from Pavlukhin's existing arxiv-author status for endorsement.
+**Status:** READY-TO-SEND. Marko reviews + adjusts tone, then sends.
+**Reply window:** 24-72h. Path D fallback (methodology.md in OSS repo) already live if Pavlukhin doesn't respond.
+**Authority:** PM master §3a — Path A primary; v1.0 Phase 2 DAY0-CRED-05.
+
+---
+
+## Subject line options (pick one)
+
+- **A (direct):** "Quick ask: standalone EVOLVESCHEMA arxiv preprint for Waggle paper citation"
+- **B (relational):** "Following up on EVOLVESCHEMA — quick arxiv coordination request"
+- **C (concise):** "EVOLVESCHEMA arxiv question — 5 min read"
+
+**Recommend A** — sets clear expectation in the inbox preview.
+
+---
+
+## Email body (DRAFT — Marko reviews + sends)
+
+> Hi Mikhail,
+>
+> Hope you're well. Brief context + a coordination ask.
+>
+> We're publishing a Waggle/hive-mind paper next week on apples-to-apples methodology for LoCoMo (long-context memory benchmark). Our substrate score is 74% on the canonical fixture vs Mem0's published 66.9% — a +7.1pp gap that we trace partly to methodology choices (judge ensemble, no-context vs full-context cell definitions) and partly to the substrate architecture (bitemporal KG + IPB compression).
+>
+> The architecture relies on a prompt-evolution component that descends directly from your EVOLVESCHEMA work. We're citing you in §3.2 and §5.3 of the paper, and the lineage attribution is unambiguous — your name is in the paper either as a co-author candidate or as a strong primary citation, your call.
+>
+> **The ask:** Would you consider submitting a standalone EVOLVESCHEMA preprint to arxiv (cs.AI) in the next 1-2 weeks? Even a 4-6 page write-up of the core method, separate from any longer paper you're working on, would be enormously helpful because:
+>
+> 1. It lets our Waggle paper cite an arxiv ID rather than an informal lineage reference.
+> 2. As an existing arxiv author, you could endorse our submission, which gates first-time submissions to cs.AI.
+>
+> If you're already planning a fuller EVOLVESCHEMA paper, even a placeholder/draft preprint would work for both purposes — the endorsement chain only needs the arxiv-author status to exist, not the final version.
+>
+> Happy to share our paper draft if helpful (currently at the methodology-doc stage; the LoCoMo numbers are pre-registered + reproducible). And of course we can coordinate authorship/citation framing whichever way suits you best.
+>
+> No pressure if the timing doesn't work — we have a fallback path that doesn't require arxiv coordination. But Path A (your standalone preprint) is materially stronger for the paper, and I wanted to offer it first.
+>
+> Quick yes/no/maybe in a few days would help us calibrate the Day-0 sequencing.
+>
+> Thanks,
+> Marko
+
+---
+
+## Tone calibration (for Marko's review)
+
+- **Specific number:** "74% vs Mem0's 66.9%" is concrete; signals we're serious about evidence.
+- **Attribution latitude:** "co-author candidate or primary citation, your call" — flexible without being pushy.
+- **Time-bounded but not pressuring:** "next 1-2 weeks" + "Quick yes/no/maybe in a few days" — clear window but no urgency.
+- **Path D acknowledged:** "we have a fallback path" — signals this isn't blocking the launch (per PM master §3a) and respects his time.
+- **Length:** ~310 words. Within "5 min read" framing of subject C.
+
+## Send mechanics
+
+1. Marko reviews + adjusts tone (especially the "your name is in the paper either as a co-author candidate or as a strong primary citation" framing — this depends on M-04 strategic decision pending on attribution).
+2. Marko sends from his personal email (not company; lineage is academic).
+3. Marko marks calendar reminder for T+72h to chase if no reply.
+4. Path D activation: if no reply by 2026-05-17 (T+7d), pivot to methodology.md citation in OSS repo per `decisions/2026-05-02-track-e-arxiv-7-decisions.md` Path D fallback.
+
+## Reply handling
+
+- **YES:** Marko replies with paper draft + arxiv submission timeline coordination. CONT-03 closes.
+- **MAYBE / "let me think":** Marko gives him 72h. Pre-schedule a chase email.
+- **NO:** Marko thanks him + activates Path D. No bridge burned; attribution remains in paper.
+- **NO REPLY 7d:** Path D auto-activates. No further follow-up.