This commit is contained in:
27
docs/addictiveness-audit-2026-05-28/PLAN.md
Normal file
27
docs/addictiveness-audit-2026-05-28/PLAN.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
|
||||
# Waggle OS · Addictiveness + 10-Persona Audit
|
||||
**Started:** 2026-05-28 · Goal: 10/10 across 10 personas on addictiveness, become "the one AI tool" they need.
|
||||
|
||||
## Constraint from saved rule (workflow-reality-check)
|
||||
Each persona's workflow must be grounded in where their traces ACTUALLY live, not invented friction. Cross-platform claims need a concrete user-trigger; generic "this segment matters" doesn't clear the epistemic gate.
|
||||
|
||||
## Order (per user instruction)
|
||||
1. **Benchmark research** — OpenClaw, Hermes, Claude Cowork, Claude Code-for-non-coding
|
||||
2. **Addictiveness rubric** — Hook model adapted to AI assistant
|
||||
3. **10 personas** — across tech-knowledge spectrum, epistemically grounded
|
||||
4. **Baseline audit** — score current build per persona
|
||||
5. **Triage + surgical fixes** — minimal diffs, per CLAUDE.md §3.3
|
||||
6. **Re-audit + iterate** until 10/10 each
|
||||
7. **Feature requests** — synthesize what each persona wishes existed
|
||||
|
||||
## Distinct from prior UX audit
|
||||
The 2026-05-27 audit (1dc7df3 / 57f6f04) covered USABILITY (can users complete tasks). This one covers ADDICTIVENESS (do users come back / make Waggle the one tool). Different rubric, different fixes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Files
|
||||
- BENCHMARK-{openclaw,hermes,cowork,claude-code-nc}.md — competitor cards
|
||||
- RUBRIC.md — addictiveness scoring dimensions
|
||||
- PERSONAS.md — 10 personas
|
||||
- BASELINE.md — per-persona baseline score
|
||||
- FIX-LIST.md — triage
|
||||
- ITER-N.md — iteration results
|
||||
- FEATURE-REQUESTS.md — synthesis
|
||||
- screens/ — visual evidence
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user